ChatGPT
OpenAI's general-purpose assistant for drafting, analysis and research — profiled without verified prices, because OpenAI blocks our check.
Start from what you need to produce. Review what each tool does, what it costs and where its limits are — with the source and the date we checked it.
A starting point for your task.
General drafting and everyday questionsWhat can you do with ChatGPT?Podcasts and talking-head videoWhat can you do with Descript?Sales and client-facing decksWhat can you do with Pitch?See how they differUse AI for X is a directory of 9 AI tools, built from each vendor’s own product and pricing pages. Every profile lists what the tool does, what its plans cost, where the usage limits sit, and the date we last checked — September 23, 2026. We publish no scores and no user ratings. Where a vendor blocks our price check, we say so instead of guessing.
Learn what they do. Pick the one that fits.
9 tools
OpenAI's general-purpose assistant for drafting, analysis and research — profiled without verified prices, because OpenAI blocks our check.
A video and audio editor that cuts your recording by editing its transcript.
A presentation workspace where an AI agent drafts on-brand slides and decks are shared as tracked links.
An AI search service that answers questions from web sources and links to the pages behind each claim.
An AI assistant for drafting text, editing writing and working through documents.
An automation service that connects web apps so one event triggers an action in another.
Each category page explains what to compare before you choose.
Features and prices come from official product and pricing documentation, never from another directory’s summary.
Every profile carries its verification date. When a vendor blocks our check, the page says so and no price is published.
Documented features are labelled as such. Strengths, limits and audience fit are marked as our editorial judgement, not the vendor’s claim.
No stars, no rankings and no paid placement. Ratings we have not earned through testing would be decoration, not evidence.
No. We publish no star ratings, no scores and no "best tool" verdicts, because we have not run controlled tests that would justify them. Each profile states what the vendor documents, what it costs, where the limits are, and the date we checked. You decide which fits your task.
We read the vendor's own pricing page and record the date we read it. If a vendor blocks our check — several do — we publish no figure at all and say so on the page, rather than copying a number from a third-party listicle that may be out of date.
No. Our current provider links are not affiliate links. We publish no sponsored placements, paid rankings or user ratings. Provider links are included so you can check the original information yourself. Any future change to this policy will be disclosed before it takes effect.
Our review targets are 90 days for pricing and plan details and 180 days for other recorded claims. These are maintenance targets, not a promise that every review is complete. Individual evidence checks show their dates and unresolved details. Older checks are marked as due; a new check of one detail does not refresh the whole profile.
Because we would rather show nothing than show a thin entry. A category stays empty until we can verify a tool's plans on the vendor's own pages. Where a vendor blocks that verification, the category page says exactly that.